Posts Tagged ‘Sir Edward Garnier’

The same old story seems to arise every year. It’s a tired old thing, dragged kicking and screaming into the limelight by the CA’s chief halfwi . . . I mean chief executive Tim Bonner, and plastered over the pages of some suitably sympathetic media outlet (the Torygraph in this case). Headlines like “MP’s demand change in law to unmask violent hunt saboteurs” are usually the order of the day and while the sensationalism may be good from an impact point of view it really doesn’t stand up to any sort of scrutiny and is very lazy journalism.

Lets take look.

“A group of MPs are seeking to amend the law to give the police more powers to force violent hunt saboteurs who try to hide their identity to remove their masks.”

First off – A group of MPs who are pro hunt and probably put in power with the help of the CA in the first place. Who are these MPs? The motion was tabled by Tory MP and former Solicitor General, Sir Edward Garnier, also a staunch supporter of the CA, so no surprises there then and I doubt the rest could be considered to be speaking for the majority of the electorate.

Secondly – Violent Hunt Saboteurs. Who are these dregs of society? For a non-violent, largely vegan organisation, hunt sabs certainly seem to like putting the boot it. There must be an absolute trail of bloodied hunt staff and supporters littering our countryside and A&E units come the end of the hunt season.

Except of course there isn’t and never has been.

With all the cameras and phones out there you’d expect the CA would be able to justify these kind of claims but it wouldn’t surprise to know they can’t. They may roll out the single bit of utterly inconclusive and questionable footage they have (which incidentally resulted in zero arrests from the police) and spout some hearsay about something that a friend of theirs said happened once but without hard evidence it is all meaningless.

scum_11

Part time Dalek and Hunt Steward.

On the flip side of course there is hours upon hours of footage which shows hunters and their lackies inflicting all sorts of violence on those who peacefully oppose them (see here and here for a start).

Timmy goes on: “In the past three years there have been a number of cases where hunt staff and supporters have been viciously attacked by animal rights activists wearing balaclavas, but no-one has ever been brought to justice for these crimes.”

Care to back that up with some facts? Nope, thought not. Did it also slip your mind about the sabs who have been killed in the past, the sab who was badly hurt from being run down by the huntsman of the Blackmore and Sparkford Vale hunt, the myriad of occasions week in week out where hunt terrier men, supporters and staff have resorted to violence. There really are too many incidents to list here but a short search on the web will bring plenty of results.

OHTM

Oakley Hunt Terrier Men

The article goes on: “A constable in uniform should be entitled to require someone to remove of items, such as face coverings and balaclavas, where these are used “wholly or mainly for the purpose of concealing identity” and where they reasonably believe that an offence “has been, or is being, committed.”

I wonder therefore will that include the many hunt staff, terrier men and stewards who wear face coverings. The simple fact is they are engaging in an illegal activity just by taking part in hunting. The legislation may be weak and prosecutions difficult to achieve but that doesn’t detract from the fact that hunts openly break the law and it benefits their staff to not get identified. Bonner goes on to imply sabs are extremists and yet its the people of his ilk that are by far in the minority and extreme. Let’s face it, if you gain enjoyment from chasing a sentient mammal to exhaustion before killing it in a most gruesome manner I’d suggest old Timmy boy has his definitions a little confused.

bonner

Tim Bonner

And what’s this? Who is this chap with his face covered while watching a hunt? It wouldn’t be you would it Tim? Don’t tell me, you were a bit chilly right?

The hypocrisy is astounding.

The simple fact is it bugs the shit out of the Countryside Alliance and the hunts they support. If I’d had a pound for every slow witted comment regarding face masks I’d heard I’d be a very rich guy indeed. They’re desperate to get the identities of all those who stand against them and face masks get in their way. So old Tim really is trying too hard, but then I guess he has to when there aren’t any facts to back up his claims.

I’ll leave the final word to Lee Moon, the HSA’s spokesperson:

“The Countryside Alliance is currently obsessed with saboteurs wearing masks, which we have always done and will continue to do so due to the very real threat of violent reprisals by hunt support. 

We would ask the Alliance to explain why so many of their supporters are regularly masking up and committing violent unlawful acts in the countryside?”